Appellate.net

 
home
about the group
appellate attorneys
briefs
docket reports
articles & treatises
oral arguments
news
appellate courts
search
contact
 
3 March 2009

Mayer Brown Captures Victory at the Supreme Court in Immigration Law Case

March 3, 2009 –  The Supreme Court issued its ruling today in Negusie v. Holder (No. 07-499), which presents the question whether an alien compelled by threats of death and serious injury to act as a military guard in a prison where people were being persecuted on the basis of a protected ground is barred from seeking asylum. Together with the Yale Law School Supreme Court Clinic, Mayer Brown provided pro bono representation to the petitioner, Daniel Girmai Negusie, who has applied for asylum.

In the 8-1 decision in Negusie’s favor, the opinion for the Court authored by Justice Anthony Kennedy reversed an earlier decision by the Fifth Circuit holding that Congress had excluded from asylum eligibility all persons coerced to engage in persecutive conduct. The ruling also remanded the case to the Board of Immigration Appeals to determine whether it is appropriate to take into account whether the conduct was coerced.

Mayer Brown partner Andrew Pincus argued the case before the Court and special counsel Charles Rothfeld assisted with the case.

“We are gratified by the Court's decision that Congress did not categorically bar consideration of asylum applications from persons who are persecuted by being forced by threats of death or serious injury to engage in acts that resulted in persecution of others,” Mr. Pincus said. “As the briefs in this case showed, victims of persecution on grounds of religion, nationality or other grounds frequently are forced by their persecutors to act against their co-religionists or fellow citizens; that was one of the features of the religious persecution that led to the founding of our country.

“The law has long refused to penalize individuals on the basis of coerced conduct. We are hopeful that when the Board of Immigration Appeals reconsiders this case it will recognize that principle and open the door to consideration of asylum applications by these victims of persecution.”

See this link: http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/08pdf/07-499.pdf for the opinion. 

For more information:

M. Robert Harris
Director of Public Relations

+1 312 701 7665
bharris@mayerbrown.com


[ Go Back ]

 
 
© 2014. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved. --  Legal Notices | Attorney Advertising

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the “Mayer Brown Practices”). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. “Mayer Brown” and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.