| Supreme Court justices challenge President Obama's insurance mandate
Washington, DC Litigation partner Andy Pincus interviewed on Reuters TV’s “Decoder” segment where he discussed the opening oral arguments in the Supreme Court’s review of Barack Obama’s health care overhaul. Read >>
|
|
| Supreme Court showdown over healthcare
Washington, DC Litigation partner Andy Pincus interviewed on MSNBC where he discussed the Supreme Court’s review of Barack Obama’s health care overhaul. Read >>
|
|
 | LITIGATIONWeek: This Week in California Litigation
California’s impact on national and even global business reaches far beyond its state line. Whether you are based in California, have operations here or do business in the state, regulatory and judicial decisions made here can affect your business significantly. Read >>
|
|
| Health Care Law Oral Argument Preview
Attorneys Andrew Pincus and Ilya Somin previewed the Supreme Court oral argument on the constitutionality of the 2010 health care law. Read >>
|
|
| Constitutionality of the Health Care Reform Law
Two of the nation’s top Supreme Court litigators, Charles Rothfeld, a Mayer Brown attorney and director of the Yale Law School Supreme Court Clinic, and Neal Katyal, former Acting Solicitor General in the Obama Administration, will go head-to-head during the National Constitution Center’s moot court based on the upcoming Supreme Court case Department of Health and Human Services v. Florida, for which oral arguments will be heard on March 26-28, 2012. Read >>
|
|
| Concepcion and the Arbitration of Federal Claims
Bylined article by Litigation & Dispute Resolution partner Andy Pincus (Washington, DC) discusses AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion. Read >>
|
|
 | Section 1782 Discovery: A Back Door for Foreign Litigants
Read >>
|
|
 | The American Lawyer Litigation Department of the Year
Mayer Brown is proud to announce that we have been named by The American Lawyer as one of the top six US litigation firms in its 2012 Litigation Department of the Year report. The American Lawyer focused on the significance of our victories over the past couple of years (in terms of their financial and reputational stakes, and their impact on the legal and business landscapes), the breadth of our coverage, the creativity of our litigation strategies, and our inventive advocacy. Read >>
|
|
| The American Lawyer Litigation Department of the Year 2012 Finalist
How do you identify the best of the best when it comes to
litigation? If you are The American Lawyer, the leading source
of news for the legal industry in the United States, you hold
a biennial competition and invite the firms that comprise
The Am Law 200 to report on their litigation activities over
a 19-month period. Then, after examining the submissions
to pick the strongest performers, you interview clients and
opposing counsel to narrow the field even further. Finally,
you invite a select few for face-to-face interviews to be
certain that you have found the cream of the crop.
After a vigorous, multi-month process, Mayer Brown
is proud to announce that we have been named by The
American Lawyer as one of the top six US litigation firms
in their 2012 Litigation Department of the Year report.
Our submission highlighted the significance of our
victories (in terms of their financial and reputational
stakes, and their impact on the legal and business
landscapes), the breadth of our coverage, the creativity
of our litigation strategies, and our inventive advocacy. Read >>
|
|
| Mayer Brown a Law360 “Practice Group of the Year”
in Appellate, Class Action and Environmental categories
Mayer Brown, a leading global law firm, has been named by the online legal publication Law360 as a “Practice Group of the Year” for 2011 in the Appellate, Class Action and Environmental categories. Read >>
|
|
| 4th Circ. Tosses Suit Over FDA-Approved Medtronic Device
Law360 discusses Walker v. Medtronic, a case successfully argued by Washington, DC appellate partner Andrew Tauber. Read >>
|
|
| Supreme Court says police need warrant for GPS tracking
Washington, DC Litigation partner Andy Pincus quoted on the Supreme Court’s ruling in U.S v. Jones that police must obtain a warrant from a judge before placing a GPS tracking device on a vehicle. Read >>
|
|
| Mayer Brown Partner Tim Bishop Quoted In Editorial
Chicago-based partner Tim Bishop, who represents the petitioners in Georgia Pacific West v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center, which is currently pending before the U.S. Supreme Court, was quoted in an editorial discussing the case. Read >>
|
|
| Scalia Finds 18th-Century Precedent For GPS Search
Washington, DC Litigation partner Andy Pincus quoted on the Supreme Court’s ruling in U.S v. Jones that police must obtain a warrant from a judge before placing a GPS tracking device on a vehicle. Read >>
|
|
| Warrant needed for GPS tracking, high court says
Washington, DC Litigation partner Andy Pincus quoted on the Supreme Court’s ruling in U.S v. Jones that police must obtain a warrant from a judge before placing a GPS tracking device on a vehicle.
Article appeared in more than 250 outlets. Read >>
|
|
| High Court: Warrant Needed For GPS Tracking Device
Washington, DC Litigation partner Andy Pincus quoted on the Supreme Court’s ruling in U.S v. Jones that police must obtain a warrant from a judge before placing a GPS tracking device on a vehicle. Read >>
|
|
| Police violated 4th Amendment with GPS tracking, Court rules
Washington, DC Litigation partner Andy Pincus quoted on the Supreme Court’s ruling in U.S v. Jones that police must obtain a warrant from a judge before placing a GPS tracking device on a vehicle.
Article also appeared in The New York Law Journal and The Legal Intelligencer. Read >>
Reprinted with permission from the January 23, 2012 edition of The National Law Journal © 2012 ALM Properties, Inc. All rights reserved. Further duplication without permission is prohibited. |
|
| Supreme Court: Warrants needed in GPS tracking
Washington, DC Litigation partner Andy Pincus quoted on the Supreme Court’s ruling in U.S v. Jones that police must obtain a warrant from a judge before placing a GPS tracking device on a vehicle. Read >>
|
|
| Supreme Court GPS Tracking Decision: Does It Prevent Warrantless Long-Term Surveillance?
Washington, DC Litigation partner Andy Pincus quoted on the Supreme Court’s ruling in U.S v. Jones that police must obtain a warrant from a judge before placing a GPS tracking device on a vehicle. Read >>
|
|
| Ninth Circuit Decertifies Nationwide Class in Honda Braking System Suit
On January 12, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decertified a nationwide class in Mazza v. American Honda Motor Co., No. 09-55376, --- F.3d ---, 2012 WL 89176. Although the only named plaintiffs came from Florida and Maryland, they filed suit in California seeking to represent all persons nationwide who had purchased or leased new or used certain model-year Acura RL vehicles equipped with a Collision Mitigation Braking System (CMBS). Read >>
|
|
