home
about the group
appellate attorneys
briefs
docket reports
oral arguments
news
contact
 
Profile
Experience
  • Appellate briefs authored
In the News

Selected sample of appellate briefs authored


Carden v. General Motors Corp., 509 F.3d 227 (5th Cir. 2007)

Amicus brief

Center for Auto Safety v. National Highway Traffic Safety Admin., 244 F.3d 144 (D.C. Cir. 2001)

Joint Brief of Intervenor-Defendant Appellees

Center for Biological Diversity v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 538 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2008)

Brief of National Automobile Dealers Association as Amicus Curiae

Communications & Cable of Chicago, Inc. v. Dept. Revenue, 655 N.E.2d 1078 (Ill. App. Ct. 1995)

Opening Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants
Reply Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants

DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Ysbrand, 542 U.S. 937 (2004) (Mem.)

Amicus Brief

Estate of Thomson v. Toyota Motor Corp., 545 F.3d 357 (6th Cir. 2008)

Amicus Brief

Ford v. General Motors Corp., No. 100474 (Okla.) (pending)

Amicus Brief

Geier v. American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000)

Amicus Brief

In re American Trucking Associations, Inc., No. 10-1009 (Sept. 30, 2010)

Petition for a Writ of Mandamus

Massachusetts v. EPA, 127 S. Ct. 617ÿ (2006)

Amicus brief

Mikolajczyk v. Ford Motor Company., 2008 WL 5263924 (Ill. Dec. 18, 2008)

Amicus Brief

O'Hara v. General Motors Corp., 508 F.3d 753 (5th Cir. 2007)

Amicus Brief

Priester v. Ford Motor Co., 736 S.E.2d 249 (S.C. 2012)

Amicus brief

Public Citizen v. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Admin., 374 F.3d 1209 (D.C. Cir. 2004)

Brief for the Intervenors

Public Citizen v. Mineta, 340 F.3d 39 (2d Cir. 2003)

Brief for the Intervenor

Public Citizen v. Mineta, 343 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2003)

Brief for the Intervenors

Public Citizen v. Mineta, 374 F.3d 1251 (D.C. Cir. 2004)

Brief for the Intervenors

Public Citizen v. Peters, 489 F.3d 1279 (D.C. Cir. 2007) and 513 F.3d 234 (D.C. Cir. 2008)

Brief for the Intervenor
Supplemental Brief

Public Citizen, et al. v. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 494 F.3d 188 (D.C. Cir. 2007)

Motion for a Stay of the Mandate
Brief of Intervenor
Reply in Support of Motion for a Stay of the Mandate

Roland v. General Motors Corp., 881 N.E.2d 722 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008)

Amicus Brief

Williamson v. Mazda Motor Corp., 2007 WL 1793773 (Tex. App.-Beaumont June 21, 2007)

Amicus Brief

Ysbrand v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., 81 P.3d 618 (Okla. 2003)

Amicus Brief

Zimmerman v. Volkswagen of Am., Inc., 520 U.S. 1115 (1997) (order)

Brief in Opposition
 
 
 
© 2014. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved. --  Legal Notices | Attorney Advertising

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the “Mayer Brown Practices”). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. “Mayer Brown” and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.