about the group
appellate attorneys
docket reports
articles & treatises
oral arguments
appellate courts

Mayer Brown In The News - Archive
HTML DocumentWetlands Split Decision by Justices Preserves Appeals Court Holding on Deep Ripping
A deep-plowing technique used to convert part of a California ranch into orchards involved a discharge requiring a dredge-and-fill permit, the U.S. Supreme Court said Dec. 16 in a 4-4 vote upholding an appeals court decision (Borden Ranch Partnership v. United States, U.S., No. 01-1243, 12/16/02). Read >>
(Reproduced with permission from Daily Environment Report, No. 242, p. A-1 (Dec. 17, 2002). Copyright 2002 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033)
HTML DocumentWetlands Deep Ripping Not a Regulated Discharge, Rancher's Attorney Tells U.S. Supreme Court
Oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court Dec. 10 on whether a deep plowing technique violated the Clean Water Act focused extensively on whether the process caused a regulable discharge requiring a permit (Borden Ranch Partnership v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S., 01-1243, oral arguments 12/10/02). Read >>
(Reproduced with permission from Daily Environment Report, No. 238, p. A-10 (Dec. 11,2002). Copyright 2002 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) )
PDF DocumentBishop Moves to Secure Court Win
Richard Lazarus of The Environmental Forum calls Tim Bishop "industry's leading Supreme Court Lawyer in environmental cases." Read >>
(Copyright ¸ 2002, The Environmental Law Institute©, Washington, D.C. Reprinted by permission from The Environmental Forum©, November/December 2002)
HTML DocumentEileen Penner, Lee Rubin cited among National Law Journal's "40 under 40"
Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP partners Eileen Penner and Lee Rubin are included in the National Law Journal's "40 under 40" list that highlights "some of the most successful young litigators in America." Both are partners in the firm's Washington D.C. office. Read >>
PDF DocumentUnanimous Supreme Court rules in favor of ChevronTexaco in case argued by Stephen Shapiro
A unanimous Supreme Court ruled in favor of ChevronTexaco in not permitting a worker with a liver condition to continue to be employed in a refinery where doctors said exposure to toxins could further endanger his health. Read >>
HTML DocumentUpdate: Voices from the Grave - 11th U.S. Circuit Court Hears Case of American Church Women Slain by Salvadoran Military
Five Salvadoran National Guard members abducted, tortured, raped and murdered four American church women in El Salvador on 2 December 1980. Twenty-one years later, relatives of Maryknoll Sisters Ita Ford and Maura Clarke, Ursuline Sister Dorothy Kazel, and lay missionary Jean Donovan, are seeking to hold two former commanding generals of the killers accountable. Read >>
External DocumentMayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP's Gary Feinerman cited as one of Crain's "40 under 40" rising stars
Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP partner Gary S. Feinerman, 36, is recognized in a Crain's Chicago Business profile as one of the "40 under 40" rising stars in business, government, law, and the arts. Read >>
HTML DocumentU.S. Supreme Court accepts disability law case to be argued by Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP's Stephen Shapiro
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether an employer may refuse to hire someone for a job that would pose a significant risk to the applicant's health or life. Read >>
(Abstracted from The Chicago Tribune)
HTML DocumentMartin Redish joins Mayer, Brown & Platt as special counsel
Northwestern University scholar Martin H. Redish has joined Mayer, Brown & Platt as special counsel. Professor Redish, who was recently included on a list of the 75 most cited legal scholars of all time, is a nationally renowned authority on the subjects of federal jurisdiction, civil procedure, freedom of expression and constitutional law. Read >>
HTML DocumentSupreme Court limits plaintiff suits on defrauding FDA - case argued by Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP's Kenneth Geller
In Buckman Company v. Plaintiffs' Legal Committee, the Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision written by Chief Justice William Rehnquist, ruled that federal law preempts state-law tort claims alleging fraud on the Food and Drug Administration. Read >>
(Abstracted from The Wall Street Journal)
PDF DocumentMay it Please the Court
October 2000 - An article written by Christine Hogan, in the ABA's journal Litigation, that discusses the assistance she received from Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP's Steve Shapiro and Ken Geller in preparing for her first argument before the Supreme Court. Read >>
This article originally appeared in the October 2000 issue of FOR THE DEFENSE, and was reproduced in the ABA journal LITIGATION, Vol. 27 No. 4 (Summer 2001). It is reproduced by permission of both the ABA and the Defense Research Institute.
Affirmative Action
Eileen Penner, a partner in the Washington, D.C. office, represented General Motors in filing a friend of the court brief supporting affirmative action at the University of Michigan. In its August 27th issue, The Chicago Tribune quoted Penner noting that the issue of diversity has become such a part of corporate culture that companies are coming out to defend it on other levels, such as in education. 
External DocumentA Legal Academic
18 March 1996 - High Court Litigator Takes special Pride Seeing Name on Book Read >>
(Copyright 1996 Daily Journal Corp. Reprinted With Permission. Originally published by the Los Angeles Daily Journal on March 18, 1996.)
HTML DocumentFoe of Punitives Tries to Nudge The Court: Andrew Frey Carefully Builds a Body of Law as he Aims For The Prize - A Win From The Justices
16 October 1995, Washington - For the federal government's top Supreme Court litigators, the primary concern is long-term, not to win but to develop the law. But trade the traditional morning coat for a business suit and clients with millions of dollars at stake; then, winning in the nation's highest court becomes paramount. But Andrew L. Frey, who spent almost as many years in the Office of Solicitor General, representing the United States, as he has in private practice, aims to do both-win and develop the law, particularly the law on punitive damages.  Read >>
(Reprinted with permission from The National Law Journal, October 16, 1995. Copyright 1995 by the New York Law Publishing Company.)
HTML DocumentHe Makes Mark as Legal Sleuth
12 June 1995 - Perry Mason Look-alike Enjoys Finding Solutions Read >>
Copyright 1995 Daily Journal Corp. Reprinted With Permission. Originally published by the Los Angeles Daily Journal on June 12, 1995.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
   view all >>
[ Back to news page ]

© 2014. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved. --  Legal Notices | Attorney Advertising

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the “Mayer Brown Practices”). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. “Mayer Brown” and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.