 | Mayer Brown a Law360 “Practice Group of the Year”
in Appellate, Class Action and Environmental categories
Mayer Brown, a leading global law firm, has been named by the online legal publication Law360 as a “Practice Group of the Year” for 2011 in the Appellate, Class Action and Environmental categories. Read >>
|
|
 | 4th Circ. Tosses Suit Over FDA-Approved Medtronic Device
Law360 discusses Walker v. Medtronic, a case successfully argued by Washington, DC appellate partner Andrew Tauber. Read >>
|
|
 | Supreme Court says police need warrant for GPS tracking
Washington, DC Litigation partner Andy Pincus quoted on the Supreme Court’s ruling in U.S v. Jones that police must obtain a warrant from a judge before placing a GPS tracking device on a vehicle. Read >>
|
|
| Mayer Brown Partner Tim Bishop Quoted In Editorial
Chicago-based partner Tim Bishop, who represents the petitioners in Georgia Pacific West v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center, which is currently pending before the U.S. Supreme Court, was quoted in an editorial discussing the case. Read >>
|
|
| Scalia Finds 18th-Century Precedent For GPS Search
Washington, DC Litigation partner Andy Pincus quoted on the Supreme Court’s ruling in U.S v. Jones that police must obtain a warrant from a judge before placing a GPS tracking device on a vehicle. Read >>
|
|
| Warrant needed for GPS tracking, high court says
Washington, DC Litigation partner Andy Pincus quoted on the Supreme Court’s ruling in U.S v. Jones that police must obtain a warrant from a judge before placing a GPS tracking device on a vehicle.
Article appeared in more than 250 outlets. Read >>
|
|
| High Court: Warrant Needed For GPS Tracking Device
Washington, DC Litigation partner Andy Pincus quoted on the Supreme Court’s ruling in U.S v. Jones that police must obtain a warrant from a judge before placing a GPS tracking device on a vehicle. Read >>
|
|
| Police violated 4th Amendment with GPS tracking, Court rules
Washington, DC Litigation partner Andy Pincus quoted on the Supreme Court’s ruling in U.S v. Jones that police must obtain a warrant from a judge before placing a GPS tracking device on a vehicle.
Article also appeared in The New York Law Journal and The Legal Intelligencer. Read >>
Reprinted with permission from the January 23, 2012 edition of The National Law Journal © 2012 ALM Properties, Inc. All rights reserved. Further duplication without permission is prohibited. |
|
| Supreme Court: Warrants needed in GPS tracking
Washington, DC Litigation partner Andy Pincus quoted on the Supreme Court’s ruling in U.S v. Jones that police must obtain a warrant from a judge before placing a GPS tracking device on a vehicle. Read >>
|
|
| Supreme Court GPS Tracking Decision: Does It Prevent Warrantless Long-Term Surveillance?
Washington, DC Litigation partner Andy Pincus quoted on the Supreme Court’s ruling in U.S v. Jones that police must obtain a warrant from a judge before placing a GPS tracking device on a vehicle. Read >>
|
|
