Mayer Brown Appellate News
- Three Mayer Brown partners named 2020 “Rising Stars” by Law360
-
Trigger Events and Requirements for Default-Rate Duties Highlighted by Recent Case
The concept of default-rate interest — interest that accrues on a debt at a higher-than-normal rate if the debtor defaults on terms of the underlying financial instrument — is well known. Default-rate duties, however, may be lesRead »
- Visa Hopefuls, Businesses Aim To Block Trump's Entry Bans
- Ivy League, Tech Giants Back Challenge To Student Visa Rules
- US Supreme Court discards Bob Richards rule holds Federal Common Law does not govern intercompany distribution of tax refunds
- Rising Star: Mayer Brown's Daniel E. Jones
- USWNT Adds Mayer Brown Appellate Attys In Equal Pay Suit
- American women hire appeals lawyers in equal pay lawsuit
- Scodro on recent Supreme Court cases, Gelent on his Supreme Court asylum case, Levinson on masks, Baker on waivers and much more
- 17 Mayer Brown lawyers named to The Legal 500’s “Hall of Fame”
- Supreme Court declares CFPB unconstitutional
- ‘Cases and Controversies’ PODCAST: Historic Roberts Court Week
- Inside the legal strategy to topple New York’s rent law
- Ninth Circuit Affirms Unreliability of Expert’s Attempt to Extrapolate From Miniscule Sample to Massive, Nationwide Class
-
Mayer Brown Leads Legal Challenge to Trump's Executive Order Targeting Social Media Companies
The lawsuit claims the president's order violates the free speech protections of social media companies and its users. The Center for Democracy and Technology has sued President Donald Trump over an executive order seeking to crRead »
- Can the DOL Effectively Police Pension Fiduciary Breaches Alone?
- Supreme Court Decision in Thole v. U.S. Bank Has Major Implications for Pensions
- Supreme Court’s Thole v. U.S. Bank Ruling Has Constitutional Implications
- Supreme Court Limits Fiduciary Breach Lawsuits
- Appellate Lawyers hear justices’ takes on virtual arguments
- California Employees Face Skeptical Courts on Punitive Damages
-
Without a Willfulness Requirement, Is the Path Clearer for Brand Owners to Pursue and Recover Trademark Damages?
Until its April 23 decision in Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil Group, Inc. (No. 18-1233), the Supreme Court had not ruled on whether a trademark owner must prove that the defendant's infringement was willful or intentional in order to reRead »
-
Wishful Thinking: Why the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Opinion in Friends of DeVito v. Wolf Does Not Support Insurance Coverage for Business Losses Resulting from COVID-19 Shutdown Orders
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently held that the governor of Pennsylvania properly invoked statutory authority to order non-life-sustaining businesses to shut down to reduce the spread of COVID-19. In a recent Law360 article, an entRead »
- Remote Court Arguments Pose Challenges, New Routines for Lawyers