First Amendment and Collective Bargaining—Validity of Agency-Shop Arrangements
Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association, No. 14-915
Leaving a hotly contested issue for another day, the Supreme Court announced today that the Justices had divided evenly as to whether the First Amendment permits the mandatory assessment of “agency shop” fees on public-sector employees, to support collective bargaining. In Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209 (1977), the Supreme Court held that such fees were allowed under the First Amendment. After expressing doubt about Abood’s continuing validity in Harris v. Quinn, 134 S. Ct. 2618 (2014), and Knox v. Serv. Employees Int’l Union, 132 S. Ct. 2277 (2012), the Supreme Court had agreed to decide whether Abood should be overruled.
Today’s action has the effect of leaving Abood in place, even though a 4-4 judgment does not set new precedent. As is customary, no opinions were filed explaining the rationales of the Justices on either side of the divide.
Any questions should be directed to Brian D. Netter (+1 202 263 3339) in our Washington office.